Bonti Ltd produces three different products using two production departments. The company currently uses Absorption Costing to establish product costs and profitability. The Directors have recently attended a conference on Activity Based Costing (ABC) and are examining whether ABC might provide a better system for Bonti Ltd.

The following budgeted information for the period ended 31 December 2017 has been collated for each of the three products:

Product Taya Maya Paya
Production and Sales (units) 8,750 4,000 6,000
Unit sales price (GH¢) 56 106 84
Direct materials 1.5kg 6kg 7kg
Direct labour:
– Machine Department (hours per unit) 1 hour 8 hours 6 hours
– Assembly Department (hours per unit) 4 hours 3 hours 1 hour
Direct expenses (GH¢ per unit) 2 6 3
Machine Department (machine hours per unit) 2 hours 5 hours 4 hours

Raw material costs GH¢4 per kilo, and the hourly rate for all labour is GH¢5. The direct expenses relate entirely to specialized packaging, which is uniquely designed for each of the products and is therefore directly attributable to that product alone.

The current costing system absorbs overheads to the Machine and Assembly Departments on the basis of a recovery rate of GH¢3.50 per machine hour and GH¢1 per labour hour respectively.

The following is an analysis of the overheads by department:

Department Overheads (GH¢)
Purchasing Department 22,400
Production Set-up & Design Dept 34,500
Customer Service Department 32,600
Machine Department 123,000
Assembly Department 26,500

The Departmental Managers have provided the following additional information about operations in their departments:

Activity Taya Maya Paya Total
Number of set-ups 10 10 30 50
Number of customer orders 80 86 160 326
Number of purchase orders 30 32 50 112

The Machine Department is capital intensive, and the Assembly Department is labour intensive.

Required:

a) Calculate the prime cost for each product.
b) Calculate the profit per unit for each product if overheads are absorbed on the Current Costing basis.
c) Calculate the profit per unit for each product if overheads are absorbed using an Activity Based Costing approach. Clearly identify any cost drivers you assign.
d) Comment on why there is a difference between the profit/loss shown on an Absorption Costing basis and that shown using Activity Based Costing.
e) Identify THREE limitations of Activity Based Costing.

a) Prime cost for each product:

Taya Maya Paya
Direct materials @ GH¢4 per kg 6 24 28
Direct labour @ GH¢5 per hour
– Machine Dept 5 40 30
– Assembly Dept 20 15 5
Direct expenses 2 6 3
Prime cost 33 85 66

(3 marks)

b) Profit per unit calculation using current absorption basis:

Taya Maya Paya
Prime Cost 33.00 85.00 66.00
Overhead absorption:
– Machine Dept @ GH¢3.50 per machine hour 7.00 17.50 14.00
– Assembly Dept @ GH¢1.00 per labour hour 4.00 3.00 1.00
Total Product Cost 44.00 105.50 81.00
Selling Price 56.00 106.00 84.00
Profit Per Unit 12.00 0.50 3.00

(5 marks)

c) Per unit profit calculation using Activity Based Costing basis:

Taya Maya Paya
Overhead Allocation:
– Purchasing Dept (W1) 6,000 6,400 10,000
– Production Set-up & Dept (W2) 6,900 6,900 20,700
– Customer Service Dept (W3) 8,600 8,600 16,000
– Machine Dept (W4) 35,000 40,000 48,000
– Assembly Dept (W5) 17,500 6,000 3,000
Total Product overheads 73,400 67,900 97,700
Units Produced 8,750 4,000 6,000
Overhead per Unit 8.39 16.98 16.28
Prime Cost 33.00 85.00 66.00
Total Product Cost 41.39 101.98 82.28
Selling Price 56.00 106.00 84.00
Profit per Unit 14.61 4.02 1.72

WORKINGS

Cost Drivers and Rates per unit of Cost Driver:

  • W1: ABC cost per unit of driver for purchasing department:
    GH¢ 22,400 / 112 = GH¢ 200 per purchase department
  • W2: ABC cost per unit of driver for set up & design department:
    GH¢ 34,500 / 50 = GH¢ 690 per set up
  • W3: ABC cost per unit of driver for customer service department:
    GH¢ 32,600 / 326 = GH¢ 100 per customer order
  • W4: ABC cost per unit of driver for machine department:
    GH¢ 123,000 / 61,500 = GH¢ 2 per machine hour
  • W5: ABC cost per unit of driver for Assembly Department:
    GH¢ 26,500 / 53,000 = GH¢ 0.50 per assembly labour hour
  • Machine Hours (Machine Dept):
    Taya (8,750 x 2 hrs) = 17,500 hours
    Maya (4,000 x 5 hrs) = 20,000 hours
    Paya (6,000 x 4 hrs) = 24,000 hours
    Total: 61,500 hours
  • Labour Hours (Assembly Dept):
    Taya (8,750 x 4 hrs) = 35,000 hours
    Maya (4,000 x 3 hrs) = 12,000 hours
    Paya (6,000 x 1 hr) = 6,000 hours
    Total: 53,000 hours

(11 marks evenly spread)

d) Comment on the difference between Absorption Costing and Activity Based Costing:

  • Under the traditional absorption costing system, overheads are absorbed based on volume-driven cost drivers such as machine hours and labour hours. However, Activity-Based Costing (ABC) allocates overheads using more specific cost drivers, such as the number of setups, customer orders, and purchase orders. This results in more accurate product costing under ABC.
  • In this case, Maya shows a higher profit under ABC due to its lower demand on overhead activities compared to its production volume. Paya, on the other hand, receives a higher allocation of overheads under ABC, leading to a lower profit per unit.

(3 marks)

e) Limitations of Activity Based Costing:

  1. High Implementation Costs: Implementing ABC systems is resource-intensive, requiring significant time and financial investments.
  2. Complexity: The complexity