Question Tag: Average Method

Search 500 + past questions and counting.
Professional Bodies Filter
Program Filters
Subject Filters
More
Tags Filter
More
Check Box – Levels
Series Filter
More
Topics Filter
More

One important pillar in Public Financial Management is accounting and financial reporting, according to the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Framework of 2016. The pillar has three indicators with ten dimensions scored using the Weakest Link Method (M1) and Average Method (M2).

The information below relates to the scoring of the accounting and reporting pillar for Ghana in the 2019-2020 PEFA Report:

Pillar (P1-07) Accounting and Financial Reporting Score
Indicator 1 (P1-07.1) Financial data integrity To be determined
Dimensions (M2) Bank account reconciliation D
Suspense accounts D
Advance accounts A
Financial data integrity process C
Indicator 2 In-year budget reports To be determined
Dimensions (M1) Coverage and comparability of reports B
Timing of in-year budget reports C
Accuracy of in-budget reports B
Indicator 3 Annual financial reports To be determined
Dimensions (M1) Completeness of annual financial report C
Submission of reports for external audit B
Accounting standards D

Required:

i) Distinguish between the weakest link method and the average method of scoring the performance indicators.
(3 marks)

ii) Compute the score for each of the three indicators using the appropriate method of scoring and interpret your result.
(5 marks)

iii) Suggest TWO (2) ways the government can improve its performance in indicator 3: Annual financial reports.
(2 marks)

i) Distinguish between the Weakest Link Method and the Average Method:

  • Weakest Link Method (M1): In this method, the overall score for an indicator is determined by the lowest score received by any of its dimensions. This means that if one dimension is rated poorly, the entire indicator score reflects that weakest link, regardless of the scores of the other dimensions.
  • Average Method (M2): In this method, the overall score for an indicator is the average of the scores of its dimensions. This method balances out the different scores of the dimensions, providing an overall rating that reflects the general performance across all dimensions.

ii) Compute the Score for Each Indicator:

  1. Indicator 1 (Financial data integrity):
    • Dimensions: D, D, A, C
    • Method: Average Method (M2)
    • Score: (D, D, A, C) -> Average of scores: (1+1+4+3)/4 = 9/4 = 2.25 ≈ C
    • Interpretation: The overall score for financial data integrity is C, indicating moderate performance with significant room for improvement in specific areas.
  2. Indicator 2 (In-year budget reports):
    • Dimensions: B, C, B
    • Method: Weakest Link Method (M1)
    • Score: The lowest score among the dimensions is C, so the overall score for this indicator is C.
    • Interpretation: This score reflects that the weakest dimension (timing of in-year budget reports) is dragging down the overall performance.
  3. Indicator 3 (Annual financial reports):
    • Dimensions: C, B, D
    • Method: Weakest Link Method (M1)
    • Score: The lowest score among the dimensions is D, so the overall score for this indicator is D.
    • Interpretation: The poor score in accounting standards significantly affects the overall performance of this indicator.

iii) Ways to Improve Performance in Indicator 3 (Annual financial reports):

  1. Adopt and Implement IPSAS: The government can improve the accounting standards dimension by adopting and fully implementing International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). This will enhance the quality and comparability of financial reports.
  2. Timely Submission of Reports: Ensure that annual financial reports are completed and submitted within the prescribed timeframes. Strengthening internal processes and automating reporting systems can help achieve this.